BCBS – Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Institution: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
- Abbreviation: BCBS
- Type: Public
- Founded: 1974
- Members Total: 13
- Membership in: FSF, JF
- Membership of:
- Description: The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is forum for regular cooperation on banking supervisory matters. Its objective is to enhance understanding of key supervisory issues and improve the quality of banking supervision worldwide. It seeks to do so by exchanging information on national supervisory issues, approaches and techniques, with a view to promoting common understanding.
The Committee uses this common understanding to develop guidelines and supervisory standards in areas where they are considered desirable. In this regard, the Committee is best known for its international standards on capital adequacy; the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision; and the Concordat on cross-border banking supervision.
- Working Group: Accord Implementation Group, Policy Development Group, Accounting Task Force, International Liaison Group
- Outreach: The Committee maintains links with supervisors not directly participating in the committee with a view to strengthening prudential supervisory standards in all the major markets.
- Reporting to: G10
- Website:http://www.bis.org/bcbs
- Highest Organ:
- Chair: Nout Wellink, President of the Netherlands Bank.
- Seat: Basel
- Function:
- Standards: Basel I, Basel II
Topics of this post:
banking supervision,
basel,
bis,
central banks,
financial architecture,
financial regulation,
fsf,
jf,
Organisations,
public
See also
02. April 2008 by kasi
Categories: Organisations |
Tags: banking supervision, basel, bis, central banks, financial architecture, financial regulation, fsf, jf, public |
3 comments
Pingback: Kasinomics » Blog Archive » Corporate Governance and International Standards - Paper by Kern Alexander and Rahul Dhumale
Pingback: Kasinomics » Blog Archive » Summary of the recommendations of the Meltzer-Report
“Basel III” is a comprehensive set of reform measures, developed by the
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, to strengthen the regulation,
supervision and risk management of the banking sector. These measures aim
to:
1. improve the banking sector’s ability to absorb shocks arising from
financial and economic stress, whatever the source
2. improve risk management and governance
3. strengthen banks’ transparency and disclosures.
The reforms target both micro and macro prudential regulation.
Micro Prudential Regulation
At bank-level, or microprudential, regulation, they will help raise the resilience
of individual banking institutions to periods of stress. Practically, these reforms
mean:
A significant increase in risk coverage, with a focus on areas that were most
problematic during the crisis, that is trading book exposures, counterparty
credit risk, and securitisation activities;
A fundamental tightening of the definition of capital, with a strong focus on
common equity. At the same time, this represents a move away from complex
hybrid instruments, which did not prove to be loss absorbing in periods of
stress. We also introduced requirements that all capital instruments must
absorb losses at the point of non-viability, which was not the case in the crisis;
The introduction of a leverage ratio to serve as a backstop to the risk-based
framework;
The introduction of global liquidity standards to address short-term and longterm
liquidity mismatches; and
Enhancements to Pillar 2’s supervisory review process and Pillar 3’s market
discipline, particularly for trading and securitisation activities.
Macro Prudential Regulation
In addition, a unique feature of Basel III is the introduction of macroprudential
elements into the capital framework. At macroprudential, they wlll help to deal
with system wide risks that can build up across the banking sector as well as
the procyclical amplification of these risks over time. These include:
Standards that promote the build-up of capital buffers in good times that can
be drawn down in periods of stress, as well as clear capital conservation
requirements to prevent the inappropriate distribution of capital;
The leverage ratio also has system-wide benefits by preventing the excessive
build-up of debt across the banking system during boom times.
To minimise the transition costs, the Basel III requirements will be phased in
gradually as of 1 January 2013.
These two approaches to supervision are complementary as greater
resilience at the individual bank level reduces the risk of system wide shocks.
Basel III is part of the Committee’s continuous effort to enhance the banking
regulatory framework. It builds on the International Convergence of Capital
Measurement and Capital Standards document (Basel II).
Sources
Basel III: stronger banks and a more resilient financial system
Speech by Stefan Walter, Secretary General, Basel Committee on Banking
Supervision, at a Conference on Basel III by the Financial Stability Institute,
Basel, 6 April 2011.
International regulatory framework for banks (Basel III)
Available at: http://www.bis.org/bcbs/basel3.htm
Prepared by: Rajnish Ramchurun
B.Sc(Hons), MBA, ACCA, MIPA, Associate ACFE, Basic Member OCEG, Member Basel III
Compliance Professionals Association, IFAC Online Registered User, AICPA Online
registered User, IFRS Online Registered User.