BCBS – Basel Committee on Banking Supervision

  • Institution: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision
  • Abbreviation: BCBS
  • Type: Public
  • Founded: 1974
  • Members Total: 13
  • Membership in: FSF, JF
  • Membership of:
  • Description: The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision is forum for regular cooperation on banking supervisory matters. Its objective is to enhance understanding of key supervisory issues and improve the quality of banking supervision worldwide. It seeks to do so by exchanging information on national supervisory issues, approaches and techniques, with a view to promoting common understanding.
    The Committee uses this common understanding to develop guidelines and supervisory standards in areas where they are considered desirable. In this regard, the Committee is best known for its international standards on capital adequacy; the Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision; and the Concordat on cross-border banking supervision.
  • Working Group: Accord Implementation Group, Policy Development Group, Accounting Task Force, International Liaison Group
  • Outreach: The Committee maintains links with supervisors not directly participating in the committee with a view to strengthening prudential supervisory standards in all the major markets.
  • Reporting to: G10
  • Website:http://www.bis.org/bcbs
  • Highest Organ:
  • Chair: Nout Wellink, President of the Netherlands Bank.
  • Seat: Basel
  • Function:
  • Standards: Basel I, Basel II
Topics of this post: , , , , , , , , ,

See also

02. April 2008 by kasi
Categories: Organisations | Tags: , , , , , , , , | 3 comments

Comments (3)

  1. Pingback: Kasinomics » Blog Archive » Corporate Governance and International Standards - Paper by Kern Alexander and Rahul Dhumale

  2. Pingback: Kasinomics » Blog Archive » Summary of the recommendations of the Meltzer-Report

  3. “Basel III” is a comprehensive set of reform measures, developed by the
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, to strengthen the regulation,
    supervision and risk management of the banking sector. These measures aim
    to:
    1. improve the banking sector’s ability to absorb shocks arising from
    financial and economic stress, whatever the source
    2. improve risk management and governance
    3. strengthen banks’ transparency and disclosures.
    The reforms target both micro and macro prudential regulation.
    Micro Prudential Regulation
    At bank-level, or microprudential, regulation, they will help raise the resilience
    of individual banking institutions to periods of stress. Practically, these reforms
    mean:
    A significant increase in risk coverage, with a focus on areas that were most
    problematic during the crisis, that is trading book exposures, counterparty
    credit risk, and securitisation activities;
    A fundamental tightening of the definition of capital, with a strong focus on
    common equity. At the same time, this represents a move away from complex
    hybrid instruments, which did not prove to be loss absorbing in periods of
    stress. We also introduced requirements that all capital instruments must
    absorb losses at the point of non-viability, which was not the case in the crisis;
    The introduction of a leverage ratio to serve as a backstop to the risk-based
    framework;
    The introduction of global liquidity standards to address short-term and longterm
    liquidity mismatches; and
    Enhancements to Pillar 2’s supervisory review process and Pillar 3’s market
    discipline, particularly for trading and securitisation activities.
    Macro Prudential Regulation
    In addition, a unique feature of Basel III is the introduction of macroprudential
    elements into the capital framework. At macroprudential, they wlll help to deal
    with system wide risks that can build up across the banking sector as well as
    the procyclical amplification of these risks over time. These include:
    Standards that promote the build-up of capital buffers in good times that can
    be drawn down in periods of stress, as well as clear capital conservation
    requirements to prevent the inappropriate distribution of capital;
    The leverage ratio also has system-wide benefits by preventing the excessive
    build-up of debt across the banking system during boom times.
    To minimise the transition costs, the Basel III requirements will be phased in
    gradually as of 1 January 2013.
    These two approaches to supervision are complementary as greater
    resilience at the individual bank level reduces the risk of system wide shocks.
    Basel III is part of the Committee’s continuous effort to enhance the banking
    regulatory framework. It builds on the International Convergence of Capital
    Measurement and Capital Standards document (Basel II).

    Sources

    Basel III: stronger banks and a more resilient financial system
    Speech by Stefan Walter, Secretary General, Basel Committee on Banking
    Supervision, at a Conference on Basel III by the Financial Stability Institute,
    Basel, 6 April 2011.

    International regulatory framework for banks (Basel III)
    Available at: http://www.bis.org/bcbs/basel3.htm

    Prepared by: Rajnish Ramchurun
    B.Sc(Hons), MBA, ACCA, MIPA, Associate ACFE, Basic Member OCEG, Member Basel III
    Compliance Professionals Association, IFAC Online Registered User, AICPA Online
    registered User, IFRS Online Registered User.

Leave a Reply

Required fields are marked *

*